Showing posts with label Insiders Panel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Insiders Panel. Show all posts

Monday, November 02, 2020

Insiders Panel: bullish on Bice and Trump's odds, don't expect a Trump 77-county sweep


With the general election tomorrow, here's one last edition of the MuskogeePolitico.com Insiders Panel.

Members of our Insiders Panel cover the spectrum on the Republican side of the aisle, and members are from the private, public, and political sectors from all across the state. Each congressional district is represented by an Insider, and there is a wide demographic variety. The anonymity of the panel is designed to allow them to more freely express their thoughts, giving an inside look at some behind the scenes moves and trends across the state. You can read the past Insiders Panel discussions at this link.

These are the questions panel members were asked to respond to:
  1. Will Stephanie Bice (R) take out Congresswoman Kendra Horn (D) in the 5th Congressional District?
  2. Not considering the 5th District race, what will be the biggest surprise in the Oklahoma results?
  3. Will President Donald Trump once again carry all 77 counties?
  4. Who do you think wins the Presidency, and what is your guess at the electoral college vote?
  5. Will the GOP hold onto the U.S. Senate?

Tuesday, December 17, 2019

Insiders Panel on Inhofe: some uncertainty over his reelection plans


As announced last month, I have put together a MuskogeePolitico.com Insiders Panel to discuss certain aspects of 2020 Oklahoma politics with people "in the know". The anonymity of the panel is designed to allow them to more freely express their thoughts, giving an inside look at some behind the scenes moves and trends across the state.

The first topic that the Insiders Panel discussed was the 5th Congressional District campaign (here and here). This round, we took up the matter of U.S. Senator Jim Inhofe and his reelection bid in 2020.

In the course of blogging and contacts throughout the political world in Oklahoma, I have received numerous rumors, both inside and outside the State Capitol, that U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe may opt at the last minute to not seek re-election. Most of these rumors speculate that U.S. Rep. Markwayne Mullin is the “hand-picked” successor and will file at the last minute in Inhofe’s stead. Connected to these rumors are numerous individuals (some currently elected, some not) making plans to file for several different offices if that comes to pass. Other rumors involve Tulsa mayor G.T. Bynum and 1st District Congressman Kevin Hern as being interested in a Senate bid, with House Speaker Charles McCall named as a potential last-minute 2nd District candidate. State Sen. Joseph Silk is already running for Mullin's Congressional seat.

A commonly expressed thought in these rumors is that Inhofe, due to his age (he's 85) and perhaps his wife’s health, will wait until the final days/moments to announce his plans out of respect for the 5th District GOP primary, as a public announcement before that time could suck money into a safe Senate race that would otherwise go toward flipping the 5th District back to the GOP column.

After giving the above background, I posed these questions to the members of the Muskogee Politico Insiders Panel.
  1. What percentage would you place on Jim Inhofe running for re-election for a fifth full term?
  2. If the aforementioned scenario comes to pass, with Inhofe not seeking re-election, who do you think would jump into a Senate race on the GOP side?
  3. Would the Democrats try to put a strong candidate into the race, and if so, who?
Let's dive in to the commentary.

1. What percentage would you place on Jim Inhofe running for re-election for a fifth full term?

One political consultant said "I think the chances are 50/50 only because the chatter about him retiring and waiting to announce last minute came out in 2017 and has been reverberating just as loudly from my D.C. friends as from inside Oklahoma," before mentioning that he thinks Inhofe isn't sure yet, but that he could also see him serving out the remainder of his life in the Senate "like John McCain and Robert Byrd."

Two prominent OKC-metro insiders both put the odds of Inhofe running in 2020 at 60%. A panelist from the eastern side of the state also put 60% on Inhofe going for a fifth full term, noting that Inhofe could then potentially "go down in history in Oklahoma to pass Fred Harris" and become Oklahoma's oldest living senator.

One of the elected officials on the panel said "I think he’s in, and I’d put it at 90% actually. I think he’s still got some fight left. The DC routine keeps him fit, I think he knows that, and he needs it."

A former elected official dismissed these particular rumors. "I don't see Inhofe not running this next term. I see him possibly stepping down midterm and having [Governor Stitt] appoint a replacement. That would allow them to be the incumbent before they are on the ballot. It also allows Inhofe to have more control over who follows him."

Another insider raised the idea that Inhofe might resign in early 2020, "which will trigger the Governor to have the ability to appoint whomever to that role to serve until April and then that person will run as the named incumbent."

A recent NRSC ad received mention, purportedly missing Inhofe among the list of incumbent Republican Senators seeking reelection. Additionally, some mentioned that Inhofe does not appear to have begun building a field staff and campaign team as he historically does by this point.


2. If the aforementioned scenario comes to pass, with Inhofe not seeking re-election, who do you think would jump into a Senate race on the GOP side?

A Tulsa panelist sees potential for a northeastern boxing match. "Markwayne Mullin would be in, no question about it. GT Bynum also most certainly would be in. Would be fascinating to see those two young Republicans — who are very different — in a debate. I would pay money to watch that."

A GOP activist from Oklahoma County marked Governor Stitt and LtGov Pinnell off the list of potential candidates. They continued: "I could see [Congressmen Hern and Mullin] running, and each can self-finance. Mullin has more name recognition as he owns Mullin Plumbing, which most know belongs to him. Hern owns several McDonald's restaurants in Oklahoma, but his name is not associated with the franchise."

They continued: "The two large city Mayors have always desired higher office so GT Bynum (Tulsa) and David Holt (OKC) could jump in. Neither can self finance to the limits of Hern and Mullin, though, and both mayors have instituted policies that many consider to be liberal, which would hurt them in a statewide primary. I do not see Mayor Bynum and Congressman Hern running against each other.  There could be also be a scenario where TW Shannon jumps in and Mullin stays out as the 'Tribal' candidate." They noted that if any sitting congressman jumped in, it would trigger a "flood gate" of other candidates for other offices, and that "I am buying stock in popcorn as there will be a lot to sit back at watch!"

A 4th District member also sees the 1st and 2nd District congressmen as most likely to run: "If Inhofe were to bow out, I would suspect that both Hern and Mullin would jump in."

A younger panelist thinks Governor Stitt is itching for the seat. "I believe that in fact, Governor Kevin Stitt is trying to build a resume to run in the US Senate race. For the following reasons: 1) The governor recently has been spending many unofficial trips in the swamp and also coupling it with a few committee meetings in association with his official capacity; 2) It appears that the Governor is trying to force having several major political wins some of which appear to be forced and very desperate and not fully thought through; 3) Many of the governor's current staff members are in fact alums from the Inhofe team, many of which serve in key political staff roles." They also mentioned Mullin, Hern, former LtGov Todd Lamb, and OKWU President Everett Piper.

One of the Tulsa insiders put it this way:
  • Kevin Hern – 75%. Considering we’re talking about rumors.  I’ve never heard Mullin’s name as Inhofe’s choice.  It makes more sense that Kevin Hern is Inhofe’s pick, which is who I’ve heard attached to the rumor of Inhofe resigning.
  • Mullin – 100%. Mullin wants the Senate seat for sure and I believe his consultants are just as eager so they can have two millionaires running in 2020.  (Mullin, plus McCall in the 2nd District)." 
  • Bridenstine - 75%. I believe ensuring Bridenstine won’t run is one of the key reasons for Inhofe being coy about his intentions until last minute."
  • GT Bynum - less than 1%. Bynum couldn’t survive a primary.  He has too many liberal policies that he’s pushed as Mayor of Tulsa and would be eaten alive in a primary.  I believe GT knows that and won’t waste his time on a losing venture.
  • Todd Lamb – 10%. I imagine Lankford or Cole will interject a candidate of their liking that they can influence for the Senate seat.  Todd Lamb could be that candidate - high name recognition, conservative credentials, and large fundraising base.  If not Lamb, I fully expect an OKC metro candidate of some merit getting in the race.
  • *Bonus Dark Horse* ... Kevin Stitt – 10%. When the rumors of Stitt running began to swirl back in 2017, the scuttlebutt was his run for Governor was just to get name recognition and run for CD1 in 2020 when Hern ran for Senate. (Obviously he did better than he initially planned!)  On that rumor and that alone, I’m including Stitt in the mix.  He’s in the middle of his term so he’s not at risk of having to give up his office, he’s expressed federal ambitions before, he’s the current Governor, and this is probably his best time in the next 20 years at a Senate seat if he wants it.

3. Would the Democrats try to put a strong candidate into the race, and if so, who?

One Tulsa-area insider said "Only if they can convince Dan Boren to run and I put that at near zero," while adding to "expect a sacrificial lamb" like former state senator Kenneth Corn or former state representative Scott Inman to run. Another Tulsa activist mentioned Dan Boren as the Democrats' "best shot," adding that "they need someone who can pull conservative rural Democrats again."

A panelist from the southern part of the state said, "One name that everyone talks about is Dan Boren; I can assure you he will not be running." They went on to mention Anastasia Pittman and Joe Dorman as possibilities, but concluded by saying that "the Democrat bench is pretty short right now."

One of the Oklahoma City members said "I do not see the Dems having a strong candidate to run unless Brad Henry decides to come out of retirement."


Additional Comments

A consultant disagreed with rumors that Inhofe is keeping quiet to help the CD5 GOP primary. "First, let me respond to this reasoning for Inhofe’s late announcement is complete hogwash.  While Inhofe has a stellar conservative voting record, he has a more ruthless side when it comes to elections.  Inhofe thrives on being a kingmaker and it’s an open secret how he worked behind the scenes to stop Jim Bridenstine’s 2010 run for Congress against a very vulnerable Sullivan. If Inhofe does announce his retirement days before filing, it won’t be because he wants to protect the 5th District, but because he wants to make sure his candidate doesn’t have stiff opposition."

One of the longtime party insiders said "I have not heard any serious rumors about Senator Inhofe not running for reelection. There is however a lot of chatter about his age, his wife's health and the fact that he has not hired a campaign team yet." They pointed to some of Inhofe's fundraising statistics, noting that Inhofe had over $2 million on hand at the end of September 2019, with $100k coming from a September 30th fundraiser."


Well, that's all for now from the Muskogee Politico Insiders Panel. I'd like to thank the members for their continued participation as we discuss various issues dealing with Oklahoma politics.

We'll know for sure what Senator Inhofe has up his sleeve in a few months. Until then, we'll try to keep up with the latest on that front.

Tuesday, November 26, 2019

Insiders Panel: a briefing on the top tier candidates in CD5

As promised on Friday, I am publishing comments in full by one of the MuskogeePolitico.com Insiders Panel members. This particular insider has the experience and connections to provide information about Oklahoma politics that many don't have access to.


5th District GOP Primary: Top 4 candidates examined

Even though the race for Oklahoma's 5th Congressional District has drawn many candidates, I feel there are only four viable candidates on the ticket. Quite simply, the winner will be a combination of who has the most money and who runs the best campaign. This seems like an oversimplified statement but it is actually quite complex in 2020. Let's take a look at the top four candidates in the order I believe they will win on the primary ballot:

#1) Terry Neese. Terry has been deeply involved in OKC for 40 years. She started Terry Neese Personnel and has become a national figure speaking before Congress on issues related to small business and women-owned business. Terry created The Institute for Economic Empowerment of Women and its subsidiary Peace Through Business, which helps women from war torn countries learn how to start a business. Why does this matter? Because Terry has the credentials to match Kendra Horn when it comes to women's issues. Some pollsters say this is a "women's race" for CD 5 and I think Terry is the only candidate with deep enough roots with the women voters to beat Horn.

Neese has put $450,000 of her own money in the race and has been frugal with expenses, leaving over $640,000 in the bank at the end of the 3rd quarter.

#2) Stephanie Bice. Stephanie enjoys the luxury of being a sitting State Senator who was recruited to run for this seat. She had told many people she was not running, but the offer of campaign help from heavy hitters in DC along with deep ties to PAC money to finance her campaign convinced her to run. Bice is a young, attractive candidate that many think will appeal to the young voters and could match Horn for the young women and professional vote. She has had a working campaign staff for several months and has spent much of the money she has raised. Stephanie is the only candidate to have sent 2 mailers and paid for digital ads which is boasting her name recognition.

Watch the Senate agenda and bill sponsorship for Bice to head up key legislation that will get her free press and name recognition. Being a political insider may have benefits, but in the current climate, Bice may suffer because of being a current elected official. Bice will not have to give up her seat to run for Congress and if she wins there will have to be a special election to replace her.

#3) David Hill. David is from the well respected Hill family that owns Kimray manufacturing and were the financiers behind Character Training Institute. David and his wife are both wealthy and could self-finance. While the name Hill is popular in some circles in OKC, David has very low name recognition and will have to spend a lot of money to overcome the popularity of the other three top tier candidates. Polls suggest it is harder for a male to win an election going head to head with a female and the country is very focused on female candidates. For this reason, I list Hill as #3.

#4) Janet Barresi. Janet is very well known having served as State Superintendent of Education, but I believe that is also her greatest downfall. Teachers do not like Barresi and polls show Republicans will either not vote or vote for Horn over Barresi in the general election. In her race for re-election Janet put in over a million dollars of her own money and still lost by 10 points. Barresi's primary support will come from School Choice and OCPA supporters. I do not believe she has the support to beat incumbent Kendra Horn.

I believe a ground game is critical to winning CD5. Bice will be tied up in session so the other 3 candidates have the upper hand for having the time to be on the doorsteps. The primary will cost at least two million dollars, and with a guaranteed run-off cost of another million, whoever wins the Republican nomination will have spent millions before they face Kendra Horn. Money is the #1 key to winning this election!

I have heard a rumor of an additional well-known candidate getting in the race but at this point I believe if anyone else decides to jump in they will suffer the fate of Democratic Presidential candidate Deval Patrick -- too little, too late.

This column was penned by a member of the MuskogeePolitico.com Insiders Panel. This insider is well-positioned to provide key insights on Oklahoma politics. To read thoughts by the rest of the Insiders Panel, read my post entitled 'Insiders Panel on CD5 race: GOP top tier clear, leader still uncertain'.

Friday, November 22, 2019

Insiders Panel on CD5 race: GOP top tier clear, leader still uncertain


As announced earlier this week, I have put together a MuskogeePolitico.com Insiders Panel to discuss certain aspects of 2020 Oklahoma politics with people "in the know". The anonymity of the panel is designed to allow them to more freely express their thoughts, giving an inside look at some behind the scenes moves and trends across the state.

The first topic that the Insiders Panel has discussed is the 5th Congressional District campaign. I posed five questions to the members, and received comment in detail on each.
  1. Which candidates do you view as being in the top tier?
  2. Which candidate would you currently put in the lead?
  3. Which candidate(s), if any, do you think will drop out before filing day? 
  4. Which candidate has the best potential to beat Horn? 
  5. Do you anticipate anyone else of import joining the race?
Let's dive in to the commentary.


1. Which candidates do you view as being in the top tier? 
Panelists were bullish on Terry Neese and Stephanie Bice, with every respondent including the two in their top tier. David Hill was included by four, with some caveats, while two included Janet Barresi.

An Oklahoma City-area panelist had this to say: "Tier 1 would be Neese, Bice, Barresi and Hill in no particular order. Hill may be tier 2 depending on how much of his own money he puts in."

A figure involved in government agreed on Hill's uncertain position. "I see this as a Bice vs Neese runoff right now. David Hill is the wildcard."

A longtime insider said this: "Even though the race for OK-5 has drawn many candidates, I feel there are only 4 viable candidates on the ticket (Neese, Bice, Hill, Barresi). Quite simply the winner will be a combination of who has the most money and who runs the best campaign. This seems like an oversimplified statement but it is actually quite complex in 2020."

Two others, from outside of the 5th District, agreed that Bice, Hill, and Neese make up the top tier, in no particular order. A rural member added Ballard. 

2. Which candidate would you currently put in the lead? 

A Tulsa area activist put it this way: "I'd put Neese in the lead as she's making the clearest pitch to the Republican, pro-Trump, base."

Taking a slightly different angle, this was from an OKC metro activist: "I would put Bice in the lead, just for name ID."

Some expressed concern over the lack of a clear leader: "It’s evenly tilted in my mind. No candidate has truly showed themselves to be the front runner, which is concerning when multiple candidates can put in millions of dollars and the Democrat incumbent has a massive war chest."

This comment came from a person experienced in campaigns: "Bice and Barresi both have bases of support. Granted, Barresi also has serious baggage with pro-education voters. Bice had the highest re-election percentage of any incumbent Senator, running in the 70’s in the primary and general elections in 2018. Stitt won 7 of her 13 precincts, showing she is very strong where known. Neese just hasn’t been on the ballot since 1994. The electorate has changed and I’m sure her name ID starts very low. She has put a lot of money in but Bice has actually out raised her from donors. That's why I would say Bice and Barresi have the edge for now."

A legislator said that Neese was the clear frontrunner. 

3.Which candidate(s), if any, do you think will drop out before filing day? 

An OKC metro panelist made this response: "I don’t think any of those [Bice, Neese, Hill, Barresi] will drop out. This race is headed for a run-off. I'm sure we will get into that more closely to the elections. None of the other candidates are known or raised money to even begin campaigning."

The mentality that the primary will be a jungle leading to a runoff was pervasive. This was a government official: "I doubt many will drop out. No downside for these candidates as filing is cheap."

Most respondents don't expect any of the major candidates to drop out, although several of the lesser-known hopefuls likely will.

4. Which candidate has the best potential to beat Horn? 

Illustrative of the early state of the race, no consensus was reached on this question.

One of the 5th District insiders sees Bice with the inside track: "There is so much time on the clock. I would like to give Hill time to see some more from the campaign. Today I would say Senator Bice is the best match up against the incumbent. They are around the same age but Bice has more actual legislative experience and authored popular legislation not to mention SQ 792 which passed with 66% statewide. While the incumbent is single, Bice has two daughters - one college age and the other in high school. Married with a family is a contrast in backgrounds. Barresi, again, has a base, but I do question how many Republicans she would lose over her history with education. I don’t believe any other [statewide] incumbent has come in 3rd in a primary for re-election. I think Neese and Hill have to introduce themselves and carve out bases, while the other two have a large head start on."

An OKC metro activist had this thought: "I think Neese has the best chance to defeat Horn, because Bice would divide the Republican base. Neese has no voting record and I think she is more conservative."

One of the younger panelists had another opinion: "David Hill if he starts actually coalition building . Right now I haven’t seen it."

A Tulsa member feels optimistic about the odds to flip the 5th: "I think whoever the Republican nominee is, can absolutely win. And not just because it's a traditional Republican seat, but because Horn is underwhelming, and she's trying to appease both conservative and liberal democrats in her district. That doesn't work long-term. Money also matters here. The Republican nominee will have to raise significant dollars. If they don't, I think it's tough."

One of the members involved in government felt that, of all the candidates, Neese has the best chance to defeat Kendra Horn.

5. Do you anticipate anyone else of import joining the race?

A media member thinks the field is mostly set: "I don’t see another significant candidate jumping in. Mick Cornett has told many people he has no interest and its getting late if you already have 4 candidates that will be well funded. This race is headed to a run off and it will be interesting to who runs the best race."

Several others dismissed the Cornett rumor, or felt that nobody of substance would join the race from this point out.



That's all for now. On Tuesday, I'll be publishing a briefing on the top four candidates penned by one of the Insiders panelists. Visit back for some special insights on the 5th District race!

Monday, November 18, 2019

Coming Soon: MuskogeePolitico Insiders Panel to comment on 2020 politics



As we draw closer to the 2020 election, campaigns are beginning to heat up. There will be a lot of activity in the next seven to twelve months, with the chance for some major changes in Oklahoma politics.

To comment on some of the more prominent races and rumors, I am putting together a Muskogee Politico Insiders Panel, made up of about a dozen individuals from all across the state. These people have a wide range of experience and access, and come from just about every ideological camp of the Republican party.

Each congressional district is represented on the panel. Panelists come from the private and public sector, and have varying degrees of past and present activism within the Republican Party.

Members have no idea who else is on the panel, and most likely have never met everyone else or ever been in the same place at the same time. Due to the nature of some topics they will be discussing, as well as the arenas the panelists are involved in, each member will remain anonymous.

The first topic on deck -- the 5th Congressional District race. Stay tuned for the first comments by the panel!

Have a news tip, or something you'd like the Insiders Panel to consider discussing? Feel free to contact me via email.